Showing posts with label speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label speech. Show all posts

Saturday, 24 April 2010

Brown Thanks The Patients

It's difficult to sit through a Brown speech at the best of times, but the one he's just making in Corby, another sad, preaching to the dwindling converted effort, is so notably bad that I felt it was worth a post. Oh, and compare and contrast: Brown relying on three autocues and a heavily spun speech, speaking to small room of carefully chosen party members, Cameron earlier speaking virtually off the cuff in the open air to large crowd of people and engaging them in the debate, shirt sleave order.

Anyway, first, the lies. Brown says the Tories would cut the NHS, and apparently his goons trotted out Dan Hannan's ancient interviews and speeches on how we can solve the problem of the bottomless pit that nationalised health care has become under Brown as evidence of an evil Tory plot. This is an out and out, barefaced lie, of course. Rightly or wrongly, the Tories have ringfenced health spending. It's in the manifesto. But maybe the print's too small for Brown to read - or, more likely, he just doesn't care because it doesn't fit with his divisive, perfidious Brownian narrative.

Second, his tax on jobs. As many in the saner parts of the mainstream media have said, not ramping up National Insurance taxation means you're leaving 6Bn quid in the economy. The tax on jobs means removing badly needed capital from the productive bit of the economy. I genuinely believe that in the world of Brownomics - the economics of mismanagement and collapse, of debt-fueled booms and gargantuan busts - this simple reality is not comprehended.

Finally, the bizarre. Early in the trainwreck speech, when he was going through his usual politbureau-style list of disingenuous 'thank-yous' (cue applause from the roomful of activists - and Devon Malcolm, oddly), he decided to thank, er, the patients.

Huh? What for? For being ill?

After all is said and done, and all the reams written about this weird man, I've finally come to the earth-shattering conclusion that, simply put, Gordon Brown is definitely bonkers.

Friday, 9 October 2009

Maybe I Was Wrong...

CON 44% (+4) LAB 27% (-4) LD 17%(-1)

I'm more than happy to admit that maybe I was wrong yesterday about that speech by Cameron. According to this latest of Yougov's daily polls, I was. But I'm not so sure. I'm still convinced that Cameron shouldn't overplay the "pain" message. For one thing, this poll could simply be evidence that the message has got through to people - and that he means business.

One other point: I haven't had a chance to check the press or the blogs today so maybe someone else has already noticed it, but Cameron looked and sounded ill during his speech. He was gulping down water, his voice sounded weaker than usual and he looked plain rough. Perhaps that was all part of the act, but I doubt it.

So, the next big question is: has David Cameron caught swine flu!

Thursday, 8 October 2009

The Hollow Message?

"This is the way the world conference ends
Not with a bang but a whimper."
-T.S. Elliot, 1925




I'm not one to complain, and I'm not suggesting David Cameron or his team are "The Hollow Men", but...

I opened my ears to his curious end-of-conference speech in the car this afternoon (on my way to a two hour lecture on computational linguistics and discourse analysis - what fun), and found myself listening to what sounded like the threat of doomsday if we don't all vote Tory tomorrow. It was not his best. It was certainly not as good as his last one. Or the one before that.

Quite simply, if you are going to "tell it straight" as an Opposition party leader and prospective PM, then the usual approach is to hammer home the narrative of the government's massive failure everywhere and then accentuate your positive alternate reality relentlessly. Whoever wrote that speech for Cameron seemed to forget this simple equation. As soon as you start muddying the waters with a "we're all in this together" message, admirably JFK-ish though that might sound, you run the risk of people hearing "we all caused this together" - not something I'd recommend suggesting if you want those same people to vote for you. They should have remembered that Kennedy made his "ask not what your country can do for you..." inaugural epic after he'd been elected President, not before.

Cameron did well in his nuking of Brown and Labour's extraordinary failures and he was dead right when he said that the Tories had won the argument on the economy. That was convincing, so why go on about it? There's honest and straight and then there's downright masochistic. This speech ran the serious risk of running into the realms of the latter. It will take even a very average Grauniad hack very little time to make the connection between masochism and sadism. Pain is something you can talk about, even indulge in; it's also something you can inflict. The leftie hacks will be wrong, of course, and dishonest: Cameron's honesty is exactly what the country needs. But this is politics and people who only hear the second hand accounts of biased and/or shitstirring journalists in their rag of choice are going to hear that one word over and over again: Pain. They ain't gonna like it. Oops.

So, no, not for me the rhetoric of failure. Not for me the politics of gloom. Frankly, after that speech, I was left wondering what the hell this conference was all about. And I've reached a conclusion. It was about framing the debate, not starting it; setting the benchmarks, not the tone. At least I hope that's what it was all about, in which case it was pretty clever. Having hit rock bottom after 13 long years of Labour failure, from here on in with the Tories the only way is up! Yeah, baby.

I hope this is true because I'm not remotely convinced that people will stomach nine months of the "economy is destroyed and only the Tories can rebuild it, but there will be pain", even if it's true. The BBC might have been right for once: this would be a very risky strategy. Mind you, we can always rely on the regular Brown crises to distract everyone from the Conservatives' collective pessimism. Maybe that's what Cameron is banking on. I hope not.

So, just to recap. From now on, Dave: attack, attack, attack - but smile, smile, smile. It might not be very easy, but it works.

The frown doesn't suit you.